ORANGE HUNT SWIM AND TENNIS CLUB

Home

Google Calendar

Location and Directions

Hours

About Us

Mission Statement

Contact Us

Board

Board-only Access

By-laws

Policy

Facilities Overview

Main Pool

Baby Pool

Tennis Courts

Other Facilities

Facility Rules Overview

Main Pool Rules

Guest Policy

Baby Pool Rules

Diving Board Rules

Tennis Court Rules

Membership Types Overview

Family

Double

Single

Inactive

Associate Family

Associate Double

Associate Single

Associate Renter

Tennis Only

August Only

Member Responsibilites

Membership Cards

Child Care Provider

Relinquishing Membership

Teams Overview

Dive Team

Swim Team

Swim Team Participants

Tennis Team

Swim Team Google Calendar

Lessons

Mini Sharks

Swim Lessons

Tennis Lessons

Fall Tennis Lessons

Concessions

Social

Party Reservations

Classes

Water Aerobics

OHSTC Forms

Member News

News

General Mem Mtg Minutes

Volunteering

Slide Fundraiser

Cell Tower

WHAT: Planning Commission Public Hearing
WHEN: TBA 
WHERE: Fairfax County Government Center 
 


Letter from a Local Home Owner<!--[endif]-->

Dear A.C.T.I.O.N.

I received your flyer about your concerns over the cell tower being placed near the tennis courts at the Orange Hunt pool.  I have read your concerns and also attended the meeting held at the Government Center in order to better understand the type of structure that would be built so I had a feel for how your views might be effected.  I must say, I am stunned by the vigor of your opposition. 

 

I grew up in Orange Hunt and as a child used the pool everyday throughout the summer.  Our children also used the pool daily when we moved back into the neighborhood.  If you have children, I imagine the pool has been an important part of their experience of living in Orange Hunt as well.  Even as empty nesters we have maintained our pool membership because we believe that a community pool is a wonderful benefit to the neighborhood and its children.  Our fees are an investment in our neighborhood. 

 

The Washington Post ran an article last year about the struggles community pools are facing.  Many in our area have closed. Others have made similar agreements to have cell towers on their land in order to help defray the costs associated with keeping their pools open.

 

 I believe the character of our neighborhood and its property values would be more adversely effected by not having a pool than by having a cell tower tucked in the parking lot.  Perhaps you no longer have children at home who use the pool so whether or not it remains open is of no concern to you.  (That is part of the problem our pool faces – older owners who give up their pool memberships.)  I don’t have children at home either.  But when I watch our neighborhood children walk to the pool with their towels slung over their backs, I think of how they will be effected should the pool close. 

 

I also believe that having a vibrant pool in Orange Hunt helps our property values.  You seem to be most concerned that your property values will decline because of the cell tower.  I don’t think that will be a problem and would be surprised if when you go to sell your homes, you do not list the close proximity to the neighborhood pool as one of the outstanding features of your properties.  It is an outstanding feature!  But not if there is no pool to walk to. 

 

I don’t anticipate that I can change your minds.  However I do hope that you understand that those who are not opposed to the cell tower have reasons that go beyond their own private interests too.  After seeing the structure that is planned for our pool parking lot, I would not be the least concerned about it, even if I lived on one of the adjacent properties.  Aesthetically, I can’t imagine it will have much impact.  Again, that is precisely why I attended the meeting at the Government Center.  Before I made my decision, I wanted to see what I was asking the neighbors to bear.  There are things that adversely affect our property values in Orange Hunt.  This cell tower does not appear to be one of them. 

 

As for your concerns about potential health risks the tower may pose, well, I am as unsure about that as you are.  And it seems to me that is as secondary to your opposition as it would be to mine.

 

Thank you for your attention.

 

Sincerely, A Neighbor


Dear OHSTC Membership,

T-Mobile held an informational meeting on Thursday, July 22, 2010 at the Springfield Government Center from 7:00 p.m. to 8:30 p.m.  T-Mobile provided the following individuals knowledgeable in their areas pertaining to cell towers:
•    Matt Butcher, Vice-President Engineering & Development, Sitesafe RF Compliance Experts
•    Carmen Charalambous, Zoning Manager of Network Building & Consulting, LLC
•    Don Chiang, VP-Engineering Services, Telecom Technology Services, Inc.
•    Karen Larkin, Site Aquisition Consultant, Network Building & Consulting, LLC 

•    Oakleigh J. Thorne, Thorne Consultants, Inc. Real Estate Counseling

Each of these representatives had their own station where they displayed their information (i.e. charts, aerial maps, image of cell tower on OHSTC property).  In addition, they provided handouts for additional information.  Approximately 20 OHSTC members attended this meeting.  They were able to discuss their questions with each of the above individuals at their leisure. 

There were three areas of concerns expressed by those in attendance.  The Board requested written responses be provided for your information.  They are noted below.
  1. I  have concerns about property value and the visual impact by a cell tower?
    Our firm, Thorne Consultants, Inc., has conducted over the last seven years visual impact studies of existing traditional arrayed monopoles and lattice towers of varying heights (120 feet to 280 feet) in Fairfax County, VA and several counties in Maryland including Montgomery, Howard, Baltimore, Kent and Queen Anne. The last two counties are on the Eastern Shore of Maryland, and the facilities studied were tall lattice towers with strobe lights.
    Our methodology paired sales of homes within the view of the monopole with homes outside of the visual impact area. No adjustments were applied to the data, and only two facts were used, the sale price of the home (reported in the deed) and the living area of the home (tax records). Dividing the price of the homes by the living area produced a rate per square foot. The results clearly suggested that was no consistent measurable disparity in the home prices.

    Both buyers and sellers of homes within the impact area were interviewed at several study locations. We found no evidence that sellers or buyers of homes within the visual impact are either discounting the price or are experiencing extended marketing periods to execute a sale due to the visual presence of a communication device.

    Oakleigh J. Thorne, MAI, CRE
    Thorne Consultants, Inc.

  2. I have good cell phone coverage.  Why do we need a cell tower on this site?
    While you may have good service, that may not be true of your neighbors - and T-Mobile is committed to meeting the area's increasing customer demand for great cell phone coverage at home and on the road.

    TTS, Inc.
    Don Chiang

  3. I have health concerns with the RF emissions.  How does it compare with  a WiFi internet adapter?
    The RF levels on the ground or in homes near the tower will be similar to or less than the levels you would experience within a few feet of a Wi-Fi or wireless network adapter. The frequencies that T-Mobile usesare very close to those used by WiFi. This level translates to approximately 0.1 uw/cm2 or 1/1,000 of the exposure limit for the General Public. They will be on the order of 100 times less than you would receive from using a mobile phone. These levels are based on conservative computer modeling. Actual measurements near similar towers with four or five companies antennas mounted on them have been less than these predictions.

    Matt Butcher PE | VP Engineering & Development
    Sitesafe, Inc.

Meeting Handouts and Materials

The following materials were distributed by T-mobile to members who attend the meeting.
Please feel free to review this material.

T-Mobile Brochure

T-Mobile Handouts

Cell Tower Poll

The poll is closed.

The Board of Directors of the Orange Hunt Swim and Tennis Club thank you for your time in taking this poll.  The Board will be publicizing more information in the near future on this topic.

Designed by DesignS by Sarah, Sarah Ornstein, 703-912-7977